1
General LHP Discussion / Re: Are humans inherently selfish?
« on: February 10, 2019, 05:14:03 pm »
I don't believe human beings are capable of a selfless act.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Book's coming out eventually . . .Interesting info . . . however, the research I have been doing over the last three years for a book highly suggests that Yahweh's origin is that of a pre-Islamic North Arabian rain deity known also to the Midianite and Edomite tribes, the Babylonians, Aramaeans and to the Egyptians as the moon deity YaH or LaH, borrowed from the Arabic SiN deity.
I would like to hear about this, it's a good thread for it.
I came across an interesting take at Set while reading the History of the Devil:Interesting info . . . however, the research I have been doing over the last three years for a book highly suggests that Yahweh's origin is that of a pre-Islamic North Arabian rain deity known also to the Midianite and Edomite tribes, the Babylonians, Aramaeans and to the Egyptians as the moon deity YaH or LaH, borrowed from the Arabic SiN deity.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/evil/hod/hod05.htm
" In spite of the terror which he inspired, Set was originally not merely an evil demon but one of the great deities, who, as such, was feared and propitiated.
Sety I., the second king of the nineteenth dynasty, the shepherd kings, derives his name from the god Seta sign of the high honor in which he was held among the shepherd kings; and indeed we are informed that they regarded Set, or Sutech, as the only true God, the sole deity, who alone was worthy of receiving divine honors.
If the time of the shepherd kings is to be identified with the settlement of Jacob's sons in Egypt, and if the monotheism of the Hyksos is the root of Moses's religion, what food for thought lies in the fact that the same awe of a fearful power that confronts us in life, changes among the Egyptians into the demonology of Set, and among the Israelites into the cult of Yahveh!"
Now, what are truly the odds for this?
I can say that the God of the Old Convenant was a wrathful god. A striking similarity with Set:
" SET, OR SETH, (whom the Greeks called Typhon,) is characterised as "a strong god (a-pahuti), whose anger is to be feared."
"In the tomb of Rekhmara, Set received offerings like other great gods. (and just like the biblical God)
"Swt" ,the hieroglyphic form for Set is used to accompany Allah's name implying "Subhanahu wa ta'ala" in Arabic" for Glory to Him, the Exalted". Allah is the Abrahamic God for muslims.
Of course one should ignore completely the creative element since Set rather stands for destruction, but then, there is the creative Set-Heh, both later being demonized and turned to demons.
"According to the older canon Set is always mentioned among the great deities, but later on he is no longer recognised as a god, and his name is replaced by that of some other god."
The Egyptians of the twenty-second dynasty went so far as to erase Set's name from many of the older inscriptions and even to change the names of former kings that were compounds of Set, such as Set-nekht and others. The crocodile-headed Ceb (also called. Seb or Keb) and similar deities, in so far as their nature was suggestive of Set, suffered a similar degradation; and this, we must assume, was the natural consequence of an increased confidence in the final victory of the influence of the gods of goodness and virtue."
Pardon my profanity, but I think I could see a connection.
As of analogy, horus worshippers demonizing of Set could relate to the christians abolishment of jewish customs and the rejection of the Old Testament History repeats.[/]
Dark ambience for the ritual chamber created by Setians:Too bad you can't get a hold of any of the tracks I'm on from the ToS' Black Muse Element!
https://obsidianwill.com/2018/11/26/night-sky/?fbclid=IwAR34qeMa9la3BrIFZ4RfUhv5cg7sV2uQjtzt5ghw6MBpWtfadhG-Q5s485E
Just checked TSB, I guess I was thinking "greater magic" I forgot that "black" wasn't actually in TSB (it's been a while since i read it)The associations between the western idea of 'black' as in Black Magic go back to ancient Arabic/Persian magic where the root word for Black 'fehm' or 'fhm' means both ‘knowledge’, ‘understanding’, and 'hidden' (occult), it also means the color black.
LaVey also made a point that those who scoff at the idea of curses are the most vulnerable to them, so obviously there is an actual intent of real result via something 'spooky' and not just directed self-evolution or psychodrama.LaVey & friends may have set down quite a lot of the foundation for what is followed today but this concept I find to be incorrect. Curses (LBM) only have an effect on those who believe them to exist. The best defense against so-called curses is to ignore them because ultimately they are GBM in that they work on one's unconscious mind creating a detrimental change to take place.
At what point do you decide you should resort to black magic instead of trying to solve things through mundane means? Always/often as a supplement, only when mundane options are exhausted, or usually early on?How are you defining GBM and Black Magic?
Do you think the frequency of employing it has any effect on it's overall efficiency?
I agree with all but one thing. Time is actually part of the subjective universe, it is a perception. Specifically it is the perception of things occuring in 3-Dimensional space. That times exists for us shows that we are, at least to some extent, separate from the 3D-reality / OU.Excellent point . . . I have to agree with you!