Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - Xepera maSet

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18
Satanism / Quotes from The Synagogue of Satan (1898)
« on: April 23, 2019, 12:44:29 pm »
Part One.

- There are two gods eternally opposed, two creators and two rulers without beginning and without end.

- He tells his children, “Be poor in spirit, only then will you attain to my kingdom! Be more childish than children, destroy your own will, and follow me! Do not search for beginnings or endings because I alone am the entire past and the entire future.”

- The “bad” god is lawlessness, contrariness and visionary leaps into the future. He is the curiosity that seeks after the most hidden mysteries and the boundless titanic defiance that overthrows all laws and rules. He is the highest wisdom and the deepest depravity. He is the wildest pride and speechless humility; that is the only way for man to thwart the rules. He sanctifies the high and daring, the zealous and calls it heroism. He teaches man that there is no crime except that of going against one’s own nature. He sanctifies curiosity and calls it science; He lets man investigate into his own origins and calls it philosophy. He allows and teaches everything in the streambed of sexuality without bounds and calls it art.

- Learn to separate your soul from your body and I will carry you over thousands of miles, so that you may invisibly satisfy the desires of your heart. This is because your own well-being, your own development and future are my highest priority.

- I promise you everything. You shall see and receive everything if you go my way. But my way is difficult because perfection is difficult.” So spoke the “evil” god, so spoke the light bringer

- Satan also lived in Ahura-Mazda, the “good” god that taught Zarathustra the secrets of the Haoma-plant and in the Egyptian god, Thoth, Trimegistos, who wrote the secret knowledge down into 42 books and taught his chosen ones the important parts of the body

- He was the god of the instincts and carnal lust and was equally revered by the highest in spirit as well as the lowest. He was the inexhaustible source of life’s joy, the enthusiasm and the ecstasy

- The mysterious rapport that the naked soul of man had with the soul of ALL became completely separate from the brain and was declared Satanic

- The church would have loved it if everyone was castrated, the light extinguished, and the entire earth allowed to be consumed with acid rain. Its only desire, its burning request, was the ardent wish that the recently promised Day of Judgment would finally come at last

- The Christian death rage was directed against the heathen in blood thirsty laws, but the demon, the earth and nature, were indestructible. He went into the forests, hid himself in inaccessible grottos, collected his believers

- “Be poor in spirit and meek. Be obedient, be a follower, don’t think!” That was the highest law of religion for the imbecile masses. But the magician was proud despite all laws.

- “Christ is not able to do any more than I can; through virtue I also can become divine,” said Theodorus of Mopsuesta. The magician despised poverty of spirit, broke open all things secret and unraveled all mysteries.

- The magician was the same thing that Christ himself was, a defiant criminal of all the laws, a knowledgeable seer. He was a god, but much prouder than Christ.

- The non-imaginative brains of the church fathers and doctors that were so airy, naïve and spacey had no need to exert themselves when they could plagiarize.

- Satan triumphed over Christ, first as a means to frighten people in order to solidify the dominion of Christ. He became an almighty Lord which the world feared and sought to appease. You scarcely dared to breathe because it might let the evil spirit into your body.

- Satan multiplied himself a thousand fold. He became a theologian, went into the desert wastes and tortured the Holy fathers with awkward questions. He sowed thousands of doubts and thoughts into their souls. He went into the cloisters and inflamed the troubled brains of the monks with lewd images.

- But no matter how furiously the church battled the stronger Satan became.

- But sins are not really sins because they came from this god like the virtues that came from the other god, the indolent god who said, “Don’t exert yourselves, just follow me.”

- “Behold how good your God is! Don’t you see that he has damned you already and wants nothing more to do with you?” “If we are all damned, then there is no help for us. Alas! We might as well give ourselves entirely over to Satan. Christ shed his blood for the salvation of mankind. Heh! Salvation? What kind of salvation is this, where people have to eat each other, where the earth burns under our feet like a red hot iron and pestilence causes the flesh to fall from our bones?

- We spit on the salvation that is supposed to come after this earthly Hell. This future salvation is only a lie like everything else.

- The temple of God became the synagogue of Satan so the good fathers could make use of their filthiest passions to engender the most fertile of evils

- Woman, oh ever and again it was the woman, whom had to be destroyed within the church. With wild fanatical zeal the monk pope proclaimed the requirement of celibacy.

- Nature was raped; the church pushed the woman away in disgust as an unclean animal, a serpent of Satan, as eternal death incarnate.

- Then the church had to deal with logic and reason. Before this man had been forbidden to seek after the nature of God, now man was forbidden above all else to seek after the physical application of logic and reason.

- Satan—as philosopher, he who had created the most unfathomable philosophical systems of the orient, he who delighted in the poetic subtleties of Plato, he who split the most competent heads of the good God with his Manichean heresies, smiled evilly and was amused at this child’s play.

- The Slavic Satan, Chernebog or Diabol ,who ruled the world alongside the good god as an equal principle of evil, prepared himself for a journey to shake the foundations of the church with iron fists.

- Therefore Sin was not a debt; it was not the result of free will, but rather it was the work of the Black God. There was no sin, because evil actions were carried out as a result of the will of a God. There was no punishment for sin, eternal damnation was a nonsensical invention.

- The others, on the other hand, those who worshipped the Evil God, established secret organizations and celebrated their dark, carnal mysteries in forests, caves and on the tops of mountains.

- Namely The God of the Old Testament was despised. This God was an infamous evil spirit. He knew that Adam and Eve would die from the tree of knowledge, why then did he allow them to eat of it? He lied as well because our ancient ancestors did not in fact die! He was a common murderer. The guilty and the innocent both were allowed to miserably perish at Sodom and Gomorrah,

- The Christians said the Good God suffered death on earth upon the cross. That was a profanation. How could a God suffer, how could he come back to earth at all when the earth was already a part of him?

- The knights of the Holy Spirit murdered, hanged, burned and broke on the wheel, not just individuals, but hundreds and thousands of people.

- The church believed it had triumphed. But never had Satan felt more powerful than in that moment. Only the external form of his church had been destroyed, but what did the visible form mean to him? The people remained loyal to him in their hearts.

- An old allegory recounts how Satan once decided to take a wife in order to increase his kind. He had slept with Godlessness and conceived seven daughters with her. When these had grown up he married them off to mankind.

- Everything one could not expect to be given by God was now desired from Satan. God had withheld all his gifts for the afterlife; he delivered nothing but torments in this world.

- Magic came to unbelievable honor. Satan became popular and all the arts of sorcery enjoyed great favor. The witch-masters of every nation gathered in front of the palace of the king and conjured demons by which the king was possessed

- The people no longer feared Satan, they loved him. He was even imitated in people’s dress. Women wore horns on their heads and shamelessly showed their naked breasts and lasciviously revealed their bellies.

- Now, the time had come. In an instant the powerful sects of Satan worshippers rose up and blossomed mightily.

- Satan was the only true and sole governor of the earth and of mankind. He was no servant, no “ape” of God, as Irenaeus hatefully called him, but rather a God from the beginning of the cosmos whose sphere of power reached just as far as the white, indolent God,

- Satan was what was positive, the eternal in and of itself. He was the God of the brain; he governed the immeasurable realm of thoughts, which continually overthrew the law and shattered its tablets

- Everything which originated in greatness originated contrary to the good God’s law

- The people hated Christianity. It was only through the idea of Hell and its torments that they were restrained.

- Satan loved evil because he loved life. He hated good because he hated stagnation and inertia. He loved women, the eternal principle of evil, the originator of crime,

- To the Babylonians and Chaldeans the night-side of life, the hidden, the cosmic secret of decay, appeared as a woman—“Mylitta”—the goddess of ruinous lust and sexual excess. She induced people to song and dance, to lust, cruelty and murder. Among the Syrian tribes the adversarial, evil and destructive divinity was also a woman— Astarte. She was a goddess with a bull’s head and horns, the goddess of the destructiveness of war and the originator of every calamity.

- While the magician commanded the prince of darkness and was able to force him to reveal the most secret forces of nature, the witch always remained merely an obedient handmaiden who learned how

All information from “The Devil’s Party: Satanism in Modernity” by Faxneld and Petersen, an objective academic work on Satanism.

- “There were, however, people who nourished an intense sympathy for the Devil much earlier [than LaVey… literary Satanists… polish decadent Stanislaw Pryzbyszewski… Satan was also popular among 19th century socialists as a symbol of revolt against capitalism and the bourgeoisie, with some Reds using the figure in a fairly sustained and consistent manner.” P. 5-6

- “The first person to construct an entire esoteric system, rather than a miniscule one, around Satan was the obscure Danish occultist Ben Kadosh.” P.6

- “The German 1920’s order Fraturnis Saturni was considerably more populated. It viewed Satan as an initiator and celebrated Luciferian masses…” p.6

- “Hall examines the conceptualization of the term ‘Satanist” in the writings of the Swedish theologian L. P. Gothus and finds… the concept did denote actual worshipers of the devil.” P.11

- “…conclude that actual “Satanists” probably did exist, but in a solitary and unsystematic sense.” P.11

- “… compelling argument for viewing the Romantic Satanists (or literary Satanists)… as a turning point in the history of modern religious Satanism... figures such as Godwin, Shelley, Vigny, and Carducci provided the necessary reevaluation of Satan as a positive trope of identification.” P.11

- “…Pryzbyszewski combined positive and negative understanding of Satan: the devil was both the paragon of progress, carnality, and liberty as well as a figure of pain, suffering, and destruction.” P.12

- “Pryzbyszewski can be seen as a pioneer of modern Satanism, expounding a stematic satanic worldview over a period of time…” p.12

- “Even before Anton LaVey founded the Church of Satan in 1966 there were Satanists.” P.19

- “In the early 20th century a handful of small groups of esoteric Satanists existed, and in the case of Maria de Naglowska such a cult in Paris gained some massmedia notoriety.” P.19

- “Satan came to be interpreted among the common folk as an occasionaly helpful figure, a spirit governing the untamed realm of sweden’s deep forests.” P.19

- “… several of the felons actually confessed to their judges, in a boasting and defiant matter, that they had indeed given themselves over to the Devil.” P.19

- “Satan as a god of nature, who can offer help with fishing and hunting, for example, is a recurring theme in the testimonies. The devil as a nature god is also present…” p.20

- “The romantics and the Satanist outlaws are similar in that Satan symbolized ideas or practices they embraced but which were condemned by the Christianity and conservative forces. Satan, thus, is employed as a tool for cultural critique…” p.20

- “Satanism seems to have been partly a way of mocking the established order but also a way to frighten their fellow men.

- “Pryzbyszewski actually called himself a Satanist and was fairly consistent and persistent in his lauding of the Devil.” P.20

- “Pryzbyszewski is the first sufficiently documented “real” Satanists.” P.20

- “…’folk Satanism’ opens up the possibility that the Romantics’ creative and disrespectful handling of Christian mythology may not have been as groundbreaking as it would seem.” P.21

- “… older material not available [in English] has largely been neglected by the producers of satanic ideology.” P.21

- “People occasionally thought of the Devil as an ambiguous trickster, a jester, or even a helper; that is, an entity more similar to the traditional nature spirits…” p.29

- “People did indeed believe the Devil was more powerful and helpful than God…” p29

- “Matt Larsson… proclaimed “God is no morel He is caught in Hell”…” p.29

- “He boasted of being able to talk to Satan, and that Satan had given him unnatural physical strength…” p29

- “… such blasphemous statements not only articulate a form of popular appropriation of the Devil as a potentially benevolent being… By having God and the Devil change places… Matt’s words suggest a conception of Satan as the ruler of the universe.” P.29

- “Svan Brun put his trust in Satan, who he referred to as “brother.”” P.30

- “The Devil was conceived of as more powerfulore reachable, and more tangible… than God.” P30

- “… the infamous sorcerer Jon of Hallebo… confessed to having made a pact with the Devil written in his own blood…” p.32

- “Ingeorg Bogesdotter had ritually renounced God the creator and his son Jesus Christ… Instead she swore herself to Satan, whom she thereafter met in the wood.” P33

- “the Romantic Satanists represent an essential stage in the emergence of contemporary religious Satanism [for three reasons]: they mark the first historical moment that a major intellectual current appeared in western culture positively reevaluating satanism… they mark the emergence of a new creative way of dealing with spirituality… the elements they emphasize in their reevaluation of Satan deeply influence the form and content of modern Satanism.” P.42

- “Satan’s rebellion against absolute, ‘divinely ordained’ authority made him, in their eyes a hero…” p42

- “Blake’s ‘Marriage of Heaven and Hell’… Lucifer in Byron’s Cain… Victor Hugo, in his unfinished epic poem on Satan…” p45

- “Satan as a noble champion of political and individual freedom remained the most important theme of Romantic Satanism throughout the 19th century.” P45

- “French anarchist Proudhon… his Russian collegue Bakunin…” p45

- “Satani in Romantic Satanism was associated with science, scientific progress, and modern critical thought.” P46

- “…for the Romantics, more than literature or mere allegory was at stake here. Poetry and literature were the ways in which they expressed and practiced their spirituality.” P49

- “Pryzbyszewski was probably the first person ever to attempt formulating an actual system of Satanic thought.” P.54

- “… he emphasizes God’s function as oppressor… Pryzbyszewski postulates two eternal gods of equal strength. One is the god of Christianity, who wishes to keep mankind in a childlike state and extinguish free will. The other God, Satan, embodies lawlessness, curiosity, and titanic defiance.”

- “Pryzbyszewski proposes “proud sinning in the name of Satan…” p57


This is probably not even half my highlighted notes from this section. It goes a TON more into individual Satanists, Romantic Satanists, etc. Specifically of value is a whole chapter on Pryzbyszewski, which I skipped most of here as it was not the point. What we see here is LaVeyan Satanism is not even close to the first form of Satanism, not even one organized and defined. Satanism is much older and experienced great diversity even before LaVey. This is **objective history.** The LaVeyan myth of being the first Satanism, or the only codified form, or the only authentic form, is a historical, objective **fiction**. The only reason to create such a fiction is if a group relies on authenticity rather than its own worth. There is nothing about fideistically preaching a fake history the make your religion more authentic, it is entirely a trait of RHP ideology. In reality, if we follow the CoS logic that the first to define something own it, Satanism is actually be definition more of an esoteric path in the first place, walked by true spiritual people who connected to him as a god or their main deity. This completely invalidates CoS as a valid form of the LHP and anything they have to say on Satanism. QED.

Satanism / LaVey loving both dogma AND nature
« on: April 21, 2019, 03:41:05 am »
In the Satanic Bible, LaVey says:

"Man needs ritual and dogma... Satanism has both ceremony and dogma. Dogma, as will be explained, is necessary... There is nothing wrong with dogma, providing it is not based on ideas and actions which go completely against human nature."

I don't see how there's any question on if L.Satanism is RHP or LHP. Dogma and adherence to nature, those are pretty defining traits.

Setianism / Argument for Set (4/20/2019)
« on: April 20, 2019, 04:21:36 pm »
1.  We can scientifically confirm the mind/consciousness can go against nature and has different properties from it. Consciousness is also more certain than matter and the latter is known only through the former.

2.  We  can  scientifically confirm  the  higher  consciousness  of humans  arose  across  the  species,  exponentially, in  a  close amount  of  time,  and  ~100,000+  years  after  we  have  already evolved  as  a  physiological  species (Upper Paleolithic Revolution / UPR)

3.  Humans have a teleological "best path", both in self actualization (Maslow and co.) and in the fields which create the physical body (Burr and co.)

4. Nature  does  not work  the  way the  UPR occurred.

5. Something  unnatural  and  against  natural  cannot  rise  from Nature.

6. Something mindless and impersonal like nature cannot assign teleology.

7. Therefore,  there  is  something conscious and separate  from  Nature responsible  for  higher  consciousness  that gave  it  to  humans  (and maybe  others), and this seems to have been with purpose (teleology).

Other Religions / Passover and the Wicked Son
« on: April 20, 2019, 04:09:17 pm »

So if you don't know, part of the Passover service is the story of the four sons. The wise, wicked, simple, and one too young to enquire. Even when I was a religious Jew I knew I was the wicked son, it was always a family joke. Anytime you read that everyone looks right at me haha. And I've always been proud to take it. The four sons really kind of sum up the right hand path to me and my relationship to it, especially Judaism as it's always held a unique place. The sons are defined as such:

Wise son: asks "why do WE engage in this tradition of Passover?"

Wicked Son: "why do YOU engage in this tradition of Passover?"

Simple son: "what is all this?" (Not joking lol).

Young son: he does not know enough to question and so *should be taught the myth of Passover*.

So the obvious. What is wise is to include yourself in the Jewish tradition of Passover, what is wicked is to not. And don't forget to make the young one believe it before he is old enough to question. Like I said even as a kid I was the wicked one. I hate Passover, it's weird food and you have a long service before it, and my freaking family doesn't sit down until like 7pm. You're supposed to eat reclining but I'd get yelled at for it. And I didn't get why god couldn't just, like, free us, or not let us get enslaved. As I aged I became fascinated by Egypt, and as I looked into it I realized they weren't these weird monstrous people. In the long run I ended up aligned with an Egyptian deity!

Now I hate Passover more. I didn't go this year. I'm into tradition and whatever but not this one. It's self victimizing and demonizing an entire culture for something that never happened. It's a mockery of asking for freedom when we weren't even slaves, asking for peace when we're the ones stiring up shit and god happily let's us think he's torturing this civilization (and it even says god is who made pharaoh the way he ways, so it's a Job thing all over again). Even if the overall concept of freedom and peace for all is a great one, Passover is a mockery of that concept. There's nothing wise about approaching things in this manner, and if realizing that makes me wicked I've been happy to accept it as long as I can remember.

*Xepera maSet*

I have come into being like Set.

Current Events / My current issue in world news (not political lol)
« on: April 18, 2019, 01:31:39 pm »
Reality: There's starving people, people who can't afford healthcare, or even food and clean water.

World: meh

Reality: a church with history but still just a building gets damaged.

World: here's hundreds of billions of dollars immediately! We are so traumatized!

Introductions / New Members (started 4/5/19)
« on: April 06, 2019, 02:37:36 am »
Welcome to MackFenton and Oceana!

Setianism / Disassociative Identity Disorder and Set
« on: April 04, 2019, 07:12:14 pm »
Bernardo Kastrup is an idealist philosopher we've talked about more and more in Setianism. He believes that all reduces to mind/experience, which to us would likely be identified with Set. Unlike most Setians, he does not see a duality of matter and mind, but that matter was created by mind, intentionally or no. He goes on to compare our individual minds relationship to the original consciousness as similar to Disassociative Identity Disorder. Let's look at what he says:

"As discussed above, the empirical  motivation for positing  dissociation  as the explanation for Fact  6  is  the  clinical  condition called  Dissociative Identity Disorder  (DID). There has been  debate about the authenticity of  DID. After all,  it  is  conceivable that  patients could fake it. Research, however, has confirmed DID’s legitimacy (for an  overview, see [21]  (pp.  167–174)). Two very recent studies are particularly  interesting to  highlight.  In  2015,  doctors  reported  on  the  case  of  a  German woman who  exhibited  a variety of  alters [22].  Peculiarly,  some of her alters claimed to be blind while others could  see  normally. Through  EEGs, the  doctors  were  able  to ascertain  that  the brain activity normally  associated with  sight wasn’t  present while a blind  alter was in  control  of  the woman’s body, even  though her eyes were open. When  a  sighted alter  assumed control,  the  usual brain activity returned.  This is  a  sobering  result  that  shows the  literally  blinding  power  of dissociation. whoexhibited a variety of alters [22]....

Finally, there is also compelling evidence that alters can remain conscious and self-aware even when not in control of the body. In Morton Prince’s well-known study of the ‘Miss Beauchamp’ case of DID, one of the alters “was a co-conscious personality in a deeper sense. When she was not interacting with the world, she did not become dormant, but persisted and was active” [21] (p. 318). Braude’s more recent work corroborates the view that alters can be co-conscious. He points to the struggle of  different alters  for executive  control of  the body  and the fact that  alters “might intervene in the  lives of  others  (i.e., other alters),  intentionally interfering  with  their interests and activities,  or at  least  playing mischief  on  them” [20]  (p.  68)....

As seen above, dissociation is an empirically established phenomenon known to occur in experiential space, which can lead to the formation of co-conscious alters. And since TWE is universal experiential space (Inference  3), it  is  empirically coherent to posit—as Inference 4 does—that  top-down dissociation leads to the  formation of  discrete but concurrently conscious centers of experience  within the otherwise unitary TWE."

This sums up Kastrup's ideas on DID. Now let's break this down.

1. Consciousness is the one and only certainty, you know "I exist" is true and cannot be false.

2. Disassociate Identity Disorder occurs in consciousness. This is an empirically proven fact as Kastrup discusses above. In DID each identity is real and somewhat autonomous, to the point where the identity can control the physiology of the body (such as the blind woman above). The identities coexist but are equally real.

3. So, it is possible individual minds : consciousness itself :: alters : individual minds.

4. Whatever "matter" is, it correlates with DID in consciousness itself. In other words, alters of consciousness itself are within "material" bodies.

5. Therefore, it is possible that foundational consciousness created matter, intentionally or otherwise, to create alters (other conscious beings).

Now, let's go through and look at the explanations/defences of all this.

1. Self explanatory - "I exist" cannot be false. We know consciosness directly and axiomatically, and everything else including matter and other minds are known through consciousness.

2. #2 is simply scientific fact.

3. There must be consciousness itself (the Form of it) and then also individual particularizations of consciousness. Like DID occurs in particularizations, perhaps this is what is happening in the Form of consciousness as well. This would make every conscious mind a particularizations of the Form of consciousness.

4. Individual particularizations seem separate from the Form of Consciousness by what we know as "matter". Different particularizations exist in different bodies, some having DID themselves. It seems bodies are necessary to create an alter.

5. There are two possibilities if we go this route. First, consciousness could also come with a subconscious, the latter of which creates matter unintentionally. Second, the Form of consciousness may have intentionally created alters.

This line of thought fits with Setianism because:

- matter can be seen as training wheels for consciousness/the alter to grow and individuate.

- we can still differentiate between mind and matter.

- allows for a type of idealism without completely ignoring mind/matter divide.

- explains the mind/body problem in an evidence way that does not contradict logic.

- explains how we can be OF but not IDENTICAL TO Set/Consciousness.

- gives insight into Set's wants, such as other individual conscious beings.

- puts god/Horus in his place below Set.

- allows for flawed gods and imperfect nature.

- possibly removes the need for a demiurgic force.

- explains why isolate consciousness needs to be strengthened (to not be absorbed back into Set).

Introductions / Xepera maSet (Three Scarabs, 1137, Ryan)
« on: April 02, 2019, 02:17:18 pm »
I'm Xepera maSet, one of the founders of this nice little LHP group. Been at this since about 2008/2009. My course roughly goes: raised Jewish -> LaVeyan Satanist -> New Ager -> Thelemite -> Luciferian -> Setian -> Setian/Theistic Satanist. I've spent my professional life so far in social work and education, and am a guest speaker for colleges on the LHP since I was 19. I'm also the author of "Behold: The Prince of Darkness - A Complete Introduction to Setian Religion", available on Amazon. Feel free to AMA any time.

Setianism / Empirical & philosophical proof of Set/Satan
« on: March 30, 2019, 04:09:04 pm »
"Why Do You Believe in The Prince of Darkness/Setianism?"

I have removed some of the points to elaborate on the more important and powerful ones. Sorry for the length but I'm literally proving god from scratch haha.

1. Property Dualism - this is that consciousness and matter have different, contradictory properties. For example to matter/consciousness respectively, this includes spacial/nonspacial, universally accessible/personal, deterministic/autonomous, no aboutness/aboutness, accessible to senses/not accessible to senses, Objective/suggestions, no experience/has experience, the list can go on and on. We can empirically test any of these by imagining an image and seeing if it has the former properties or the latter - you can scientifically confirm this yourself in your own home. Because of the Law of Identity we know things with contradictory properties cannot be identical, so consciousness is of an ontologically different source/substance than matter.

2. Axiomatic self-existence - meaning "I exist" is an unquestionable fact of reality. You cannot ever argue "I do not exist", and that "I" is what knows anything and everything you know about reality. Indeed the existence of your consciousness is a necessity and certainty, and all we know of matter itself is known through that consciousness. So not only is consciousness obviously separate from material nature, it is more directly known and known with certainty. If all knowledge of X depends on Y, we cannot reduce X to Y. If X is more certain than Y, we cannot reduce X to Y.

3. Ability to question nature - further showing we are outside nature, despite out material bodies being part of it, is the fact we can question all this. Materialistic systems do not question themselves (the only possible exception being systems made by a higher consciousness to mimick it, like A.I.). This entire argument is a testament to this. Where else in nature do we see such questioning?

4. Ability to manipulate nature - even more impressively we can manipulate nature, both to contradict it and to create entirely new things. You're reading this on one such phone or computer which could never be grown without the unnatural consciousness possessed by humans. Medication is another - where other animals and even our own ancestors would die to natural illness, we get ever more vigilant in the fighting back against nature.

5. Ability to go against nature - even beyond manipulating nature to our benefit we have the free will to utterly go against it. To  illustrate,  surely  everyone  reading  this  has  felt that  desire  to  yell  at  a  sales  associate  when  the  proper  context arises.  This  is  the  brain,  the  body,  the  nervous  and  adrenal  system, all  driving  the  animal  Nature  of  the  human  being  to  yell  at  the person  standing  before  them,  possibly  even just  for  a  minor annoyance!  Yet  thanks  to  our  consciousness  and  free  will  we  can self-regulate  –  we  become  aware  of  this  natural  desire,  the  response our  body  is  making  towards  our  coworker  or  stranger,  and  then…  we can  simply  choose  not  to  follow  it. To  walk  away, take  some  deep breaths, move  on. Can  one  really imagine  an  animal  encroaching  on another's  territory,  and  the  other  simply  realizing  "meh,  he  probably didn't  know  this  was  my  territory, let's go  talk  it  out," as  opposed  to simply  attacking  the  encroaching  animal?

 Another  example  of  this  is  Cognitive  Therapy 138. Something like  depression  or  anxiety  works  within  the  deterministic  system  of the  body.  The  individual  doesn't  choose  to  have  random  drops  in serotonin  or  whatever  their  specific  issue  may  be,  it  simply  happens the  same  as  breathing  happens  and  your  heart  beating  happens.  But with  things  like  Cognitive  Therapy,  humans  are  able  to  recognize these  coming  changes,  learn  their  triggers,  and  hopefully  be  able  to pull  themselves  out  of  their  episode  with  their  own  conscious willpower 139. Placebos  are  further  evidence  of  this,  where  you  are given  something  that  explicitly  causes  no  change  to  the  deterministic system  (placebos  by  definition  do  not cause  physiological  change). However,  the  mental  belief  that  one  is  being  aided  can  cause  actual, objective  change  in  the  physiology  of the  body, such  as  with  pain 140. The  mind  causes  physiological  change  to  the  system,  rather  than  the other  way around  in  this  case.   

6. "Great Leap Forward" durning Upper Paleolithic Revolution - Another  overwhelming  piece  of evidence  for  the  existence  of a  being  or  force  like  Set  is  the  leap  forward  in  human  consciousness during  the  Upper  Paleolithic  Revolution. You  see,  humans  existed  as a  species,  physically/biologically,  for  around  150,000  years  without any advances  in  higher  consciousness. We  were  another  animal,  very slowly  learning  to  interact  with  the  world  we  lived  in  within  a  purely animalistic/survivalist  mindset  (Eden). Then,  rather  suddenly,  came abstract  thought,  art,  religion,  jewelry,  and  eventually things like language  and  alphabets,  cities  and  cultures.  Our  consciousness “greatly  leapt  forwards”  (the  literal  term  used  in  anthropology),  and began exponentially increasing  on  such  a  level  that  it  still  hasn't stopped. nterference  from  something  like  Set  is  by far  a  more reasonable  belief  than  the  entire  human  species  magically  sharing the  same  mutation  which  overwrites  the  previous  genetic  makeup  of the  whole  species,  or  even  worse  having  a  massive  leap  forwards  as some  sort  of  uncaused  event,  or  the  product  of  some  mythical people  like  the  Atlanteans  (or  aliens!).

7. Hierarchy of Needs - so not only is consciousness clearly unnatural and clearly, intentionally given to humans in some form, but it is teleological, meaning it has purpose/meaning. This is best Illustrated in Maslow's Hierarchy of needs, which teaches us the path to self actualization. This is something completely contradictory to the community based life which dominated the planet before. Instead, humans are best of being self-seeking and self-caring first and foremost, valuing the individual as a separate being than part of an evolutionary collective. Self-Actualized  individuals have  a  consistent  view  of  reality  that  works  for  them  (Pragmatism) but  does  not contradict  objective  reality  –  or  at  least  they  recognize where  it  is  at  odds  with  objective  reality (such  as  in  magic). They  may seem  a  bit  aloof  and  removed,  but  have  a  deep  care  for  the  wellbeing  of not  only  loved  ones  but  the  human  species  as  a  whole,  and life  as  a  whole  in  many cases.  These  individuals  will  be  creative  and “dreamy”  but  also  able  to  experience  the  here-and-now, the  day to day and  moment  to  moment  aspects  of  life.

So what does this mean? Our minds are unnatural, they have an unnatural source that became involved at a specific point in the past, and this unnatural source provided a teleology meaning it itself had conscious intent. Both the reasoning and empirical evidence here can be confirmed by anyone and support the existence of Set/Satan. Until there are refutations of #1-7 the position stands as the most comprehensive explanation for the world as we know it and most likely to be true. In short, mind is unnatural --> mind was added to nature at specific point --> mind has create intent --> mind is of Set/Satan, a god.


"We provide the complete text of the extant Avesta, the most ancient scriptures of Zoroastrianism, as well as many Pahlavi scriptures. It also includes information about the Avestan language, and other useful information for students of Zoroastrian religion. Most of the texts in these archives are extremely rare."

Setianism / Ursa Major hanging over my new home (using SkyView)
« on: March 04, 2019, 02:48:22 am »

Journals / Xepera maSet
« on: February 21, 2019, 04:53:51 pm »
I said I'd start a journal again when things were back under control and more positive.

Yesterday a random stranger stopped me cause she'd heard of me and deduced who I was from my bumper sticker. I'm like legit minor famous lol. It was quite the experience.

We've also got our new house and move a week from today!

Fiance and I are already done waiting after only 3 months if engagement and may just do the courthouse route sometime soon.

Other Religions / Comparing the Christian God, Hitler, and Satan
« on: February 11, 2019, 11:56:29 pm »

# God

 - Rules through fear

- Warmonger

- Mass murderer

- Limits free will

- Wants his followers to be a hivemind

- Has secret police force

- Tells lies about himself to prop himself up

- Has a chosen people and treats others as lesser

- Tortures the opposition for eternity

- Allows natural disasters

- Allows suffering

- Allows illness

- Allows poverty etc.


# Hitler

- Rules through fear

- Warmonger

- Mass murderer

- Limits free will

- Wants his followers to be a hivemind

- Has secret police force

- Tells lies about himself to prop himself up

- Has a chosen people and treats others as lesser

- Tortures the opposition until death in the camps

- Cannot stop natural disasters and doesn't claim he can

- Cannot stop suffering and doesn't claim he can

- Cannot stop illness and doesn't claim he can

- Cannot stop poverty and doesn't claim he can


# Satan

- Not a ruler

- Not involved in any wars

- Not a murderer

- Gave humans free will

- Desires and respects individuality

- Teaches self ownership and personal responsibility

- Honest about himself

- Cares for all people

- "You do you" regard for opposition

- Cannot stop natural disasters and doesn't claim he can

- Cannot stop suffering and doesn't claim he can

- Cannot stop illness and doesn't claim he can

- Cannot stop poverty and doesn't claim he can


This gives us some pretty damn clear results we can confirm through history and religious claims/beliefs. What it shows is that Satan is a rather clear cultural hero and good guy, that Hitler and other fascists are far more like God than Satan, and that God is the worst fascist of all! All obvious to those who look into the abrahamic  religions objectively, but hopefully it'll get through to some others.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18