See likes

See likes given/taken

Your posts liked by others

Pages: [1] 2
Post info No. of Likes
Re: Xeper and Remanifest-words of the Aeons

Stephen Flowers/Edred Thorson uttered Reyn til Runa, or seek after the mysteries. I'm not sure if this is it's own Aeon or an addition to the formula of the Setian Aeon.

I don't believe Runa replaces Xeper as an Aeon.

Quote from: Stephen Flowers, Temple of Set, Appendix 89

Runa, therefore, is obviously an Aeon-enhancing Word rather than one intended to usher in a new aeon.

September 06, 2018, 05:01:51 pm
Re: Dr. Aquinos thoughts of WM Puzzles me a bit.
Tonight I was reading through Dr. Aquinos new Satanic Bible. It kinda puzzled me however when he mentions WM being used to control or influence the masses. Here is what I mean, "Its power derives rather from what it gets people to believe and do when it is used as a psychological individual- or mass-control device. Thus, for instance, any sort of advertising or propaganda is an application of WM, though neither users nor targets may [and probably wouldn't] employ that term."

I just feel that this point of view of WM confuses it with other view of LBM. Do any of you have this same feeling on this?

If I were to manipulate you for my purposes, that is LBM. You can see the individuality of will in that statement. I believe the difference you are looking for is that individuality. Mass control as he is saying seems more WM because it is trying to convince people to become part of a group, to comply, to conform.

If you have the Black Magic essay or the Temple of Set book, look at the section titled "The Natural Approach to the Objective Universe".

September 18, 2018, 04:01:40 am
Re: Contacting The Temple Of Set Yes active, yes accepting new members. The international conclave happened recently, folks were a little busy.


August 28, 2019, 06:09:36 pm
Re: Pentagonal Revisionism, anyone? Gilmore talks sex robots and artificial environments in this older interview. I think it sounds a bit insane personally, ymmv:

August 29, 2019, 01:30:11 pm
Re: Good Satanist books? Second opinion on Apophis. It is a working book, not a page turner, if you really want to get the most out of it. If you are up for working texts like this, I would also consider:

The Black Ship - Malphas
Infernal Geometry - Chappell
Nine Doors of Midgard - Thorsson
Nightside of the Runes - Karlsson


September 11, 2019, 01:43:36 pm
Re: Good Satanist books?
Screw it I'll fourth Apotheosis.

Not speaking for the others, but I was intending to thumbs up "Apophis" by Michael Kelly. I haven't personally read Apotheosis, but it's on my Kindle Unlimited now, thanks in small part to the confusion.


September 12, 2019, 02:05:48 pm
Re: On Kabbalah
Sefer Yetzirah, the first kabbalistic book, was write by Abraham, the first jew.

Genesis, the first Hebrew book, was written by Moses, even though he wasn't born until the events in Exodus.

Also, it is a matter of historical fact that a boy named Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider and now goes by the name "Spider-Man". My source is a series of comic books called, coincidentally, "Spider-Man".

I don't normally engage with trolls, but I would love the OP to realize the fallacy of circular logic if at all possible.


September 17, 2019, 08:38:21 pm
Re: Real practical BM Joining any initiatory order is entirely up to the desires and needs of the individual.

There are a number of sources from Setian authors on more practical BM. Two popular books that were birthed from internal Order practices brought to the open are Apophis and Infernal Geometry. Both require work and interpretation on part of the individual. There are others, but I would also say there is value in digging on your own.


October 01, 2019, 02:00:41 pm
Re: Don Webb books, which to read first? The Essential Guide for sure. It has some editorial issues IMHO, but despite this it covers the core of LHP practice very well. There are a lot of rabbit holes to follow as well if you are inclined to do research alongside of the main reading.


November 21, 2019, 01:30:56 pm
Re: Satanism, The Nine Angles, and Xeper I would take a look at Angle 5, Creation, and consider what it means in regards to the emulate/worship a figure such as Set or Satan. If you are creating the Self, that is a more distinct and individual thing than emulating a god form. If you create the Self as a god form, there is no need to worship one.


December 16, 2019, 02:45:02 pm